![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdXmWcxn_JT-ZC78XmU4G9uoaje8WGyelUBy2N2lWx3k3GeuhSEamMxogX7CQ4AMJNW5mpAOPEWRLHihx7imIeXJJ2_wHTci3iyfQCgMRGx1-7k639uvmmMqIeysD0tk8Wst4dO1G9KDom/s1600/ap.jpg)
Philip Roth! Really? A guilty pleasure? I had never read anything by Roth at the time, but I was very much aware of his presence in the literary world. I knew that he had won the Pulitzer and National Book Award, and every year his name is thrown around as a possibility for winning the Nobel Prize in Literature.
Anyway, I’ve always remembered that professor’s assessment of Roth’s work and have wondered if there is any truth in it.
This month I finally got around to reading Philip Roth‘s Pulitzer Prize winning novel, American Pastoral which won the award in 1998.
The plot of the story revolves around Seymour “Swede” Levov, a successful business and family man in the 1960s. His life is more or less ruined when his daughter, as a protest to the Vietnam War, plants a bomb in the local post office/general store and then disappears after the bomb goes off killing a man.
Obviously there is a lot more to the story than that brief synopsis, but you’ll have to read the book yourself if you want to find out more. I will tell you that the whole story is very bleak, and there is no happy ending. Despite the subject matter, and lots of profanity it is a very readable book, and I will most likely be reading more Philip Roth in the future.
But is it a “guilty pleasure” read? Maybe. Especially if you compare it to the likes of Vanity Fair or Wuthering Heights. But I think it has a lot to offer on its own merit, and I definitely wouldn’t be embarrassed to be seen reading it on the subway.